Skip to content

Dust

Custom AI agents for teams

Enterprise platform for building and running custom AI agents connected to company knowledge, with shared workspaces and 20+ frontier models.

Maker
Dust Labs SAS
Founded
2022
Pricing
Free tier · from €24/seat/mo
Last checked
October 2026

Verdict

Enterprise platform for building and running custom AI agents connected to company knowledge, with shared workspaces and 20+ frontier models.

Score breakdown

vs Granola, the category leader
CriterionWeightScoreΔ leader
Capability30%8+1
Ease of use20%7−2
Value for money20%6−2
Reliability20%7−1
Support & docs10%7+1
How we score →
Best for

Mid-size and enterprise teams that want to build and share custom AI agents grounded in internal company data, without locking themselves to a single model vendor.

Key features

  • Custom agents built from company knowledge, skills and tools, publishable to an entire workspace
  • Multi-agent orchestration with scheduled runs and event triggers
  • Model-agnostic execution across 20+ frontier models, chosen per agent
  • 100+ production connectors (Slack, Notion, GitHub, Drive, CRMs) plus native and remote MCP servers
  • Semantic context layer over connected data with bi-directional sync and incremental refresh
  • Dual-layer permissions separating agent data access from user access, with SCIM-synced groups and RBAC
  • Developer platform — REST API, Conversation and Data Source APIs, webhooks and OAuth2
  • Usage analytics, adoption reporting and a Chrome extension

Strengths

  • +Model-agnostic by design — 20+ models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Mistral and DeepSeek, selectable per agent, with no capability tiering by plan
  • +Serious enterprise security posture: SOC 2 Type II, GDPR with EU data residency, SCIM, 365-day audit logs and no training on customer data
  • +MIT-licensed core and a full REST API, unusually open for an enterprise agent platform
  • +Measured adoption inside customers is strong — 90%+ monthly and 70%+ weekly active usage, and 240% net revenue retention
  • +A free seat type lets organizations mix occasional and power users without paying a full seat for everyone

Weaknesses

  • −The June 2026 repricing is a genuine cost regression — the old flat unlimited plan is gone, credits don't roll over, and tool-heavy workflows can exhaust a Pro seat quickly
  • −Credit consumption is hard to forecast because it varies by model, task complexity and tool-call count, so budgeting means running the workload first
  • −The Business plan hard-caps at 100 seats with limited connectors; anything larger requires a sales-led Enterprise contract with no public pricing
  • −Young and deliberately unprofitable in a category where OpenAI, Anthropic and Microsoft ship overlapping features at no extra cost

Overview

Overview

Dust is an enterprise AI agent platform built by Dust Labs, founded in 2022 by Gabriel Hubert and Stanislas Polu. The pair previously built TOTEMS, acquired by Stripe in 2014; Polu spent the intervening years as a research engineer at OpenAI. The company is headquartered in Paris and sells primarily to mid-size and enterprise technology teams.

The product’s organizing idea is that agents should be shared infrastructure rather than personal chat sessions. A workspace connects company data sources — Slack, Notion, GitHub, Drive, CRMs and remote MCP servers — into a semantic context layer, and teams then build named agents on top of it that anyone in the workspace can invoke. Agents can be scheduled, triggered by events, and chained into multi-agent workflows. Model choice is per-agent across 20+ frontier models, which means a change in the underlying model market does not require rebuilding the stack.

Traction is real and unusually well documented. Dust raised a $40M Series B in May 2026 co-led by Sequoia and Abstract, with Snowflake Ventures and Datadog participating, bringing total funding above $60M. The company reports $20M ARR, 3,000+ organizations, 51,000 monthly active users, 300,000+ agents deployed and 240% net revenue retention, with named customers including Datadog, 1Password, Clay, Vanta and Doctolib.

The honest caveat is pricing. In June 2026 Dust replaced a flat per-seat plan carrying unlimited fair-use with a credit-metered model, and for heavy users that is a cost increase rather than a repackaging. Credits do not roll over month to month, and consumption depends on which model an agent uses and how many tool calls it makes — so a research-heavy workflow can drain a Pro seat well before the month ends and push a team toward the five-times-more-expensive Max tier. Teams should pilot a representative workload before committing to seat counts. One further note on the open-source claim: the core repository is genuinely MIT-licensed, but Dust is sold and operated as hosted SaaS, and self-hosting is not a marketed or supported path for most buyers.

Key Benefits

  • No model lock-in: Per-agent model selection across five major labs means the platform survives shifts in which model is best for a given task.
  • Agents as shared assets: Building an agent once and publishing it workspace-wide spreads value beyond the person who configured it.
  • Grounded in real company data: The context layer syncs bi-directionally with connected sources, so agents work from current internal knowledge rather than a stale upload.
  • Enterprise-grade controls: Dual-layer permissions, SCIM, RBAC and 365-day audit logs address the access questions that stall most internal AI rollouts.
  • Open where it matters: An MIT-licensed core and a documented REST API give engineering teams inspection and extension paths that closed platforms do not.

Use Cases

  1. Internal knowledge assistants — Connect Notion, Slack and Drive so employees can ask questions against company documentation instead of interrupting colleagues.
  2. Sales and customer research — Build agents that pull CRM records and product usage into account briefs ahead of customer calls.
  3. Engineering workflow automation — Trigger agents on GitHub events to summarize pull requests, draft release notes or triage incoming issues.
  4. Scheduled reporting — Run multi-agent workflows on a schedule to assemble recurring analyses from several connected systems into a single digest.

Pricing

Checked October 2026 · USD
Free seat€0
  • 500 lifetime credits
  • Access to 20+ frontier models
  • Use custom agents built by the workspace
  • Shared team workspaces
Pro seat€24/seat/month (annual)
  • 8,000 credits per seat per month
  • Multi-agent workflows on schedules and triggers
  • 20+ connectors plus MCP servers
  • SSO via Okta, Entra ID and Jumpcloud
Max seat€120/seat/month (annual)
  • 40,000 credits per seat per month
  • Sized for Deep Research and tool-heavy automations
  • Full Pro feature set
EnterpriseCustom
  • Unlimited connectors and MCP servers
  • Workspace-pooled credits with volume pricing
  • SCIM, audit logs and custom retention
  • Single-tenant deployment
  • Dedicated customer success manager and SLA

Other productivity agents

AgentOverallFromBest for
Granola7.7$14/user/moFounders, VCs, consultants and customer-facing teams who live in back-to-back meetings and want searchable, structured notes without a bot on every call.
Microsoft Copilot6.9FreeOrganizations already standardized on Microsoft 365 that want AI embedded directly into Word, Excel, Outlook, and Teams without adopting a separate tool
Notion AI6.9$20/moTeams already using Notion for knowledge management who want AI embedded directly in their existing docs, databases, and workflows
Otter.ai6.9$8.33/moRemote and hybrid teams that run most work in Zoom, Google Meet, or Teams and want automated, searchable meeting notes without manual setup
Reviewed October 2026 · AI-assisted research, scores verified by an editorVisit Dust