Skip to content

Elicit

AI for rigorous scientific research

AI research assistant that searches 138M+ scientific papers, extracts data from PDFs, and automates systematic literature reviews.

Maker
Ought
Founded
2021
Pricing
Free tier
Last checked
October 2026

Verdict

AI research assistant that searches 138M+ scientific papers, extracts data from PDFs, and automates systematic literature reviews.

Score breakdown

vs Gemini Notebook, the category leader
CriterionWeightScoreΔ leader
Capability30%80
Ease of use20%7−2
Value for money20%80
Reliability20%70
Support & docs10%7+1
How we score →
Best for

Biomedical and social science researchers conducting systematic reviews or evidence synthesis

Key features

  • Semantic search across 138M+ papers without requiring exact keyword matches
  • Automated data extraction from PDFs into structured tables
  • Systematic review workflows with guided PRISMA-compatible steps
  • Chat with up to 4 papers simultaneously on the free tier
  • Automated research reports synthesizing evidence across sources
  • Clinical trials search covering 545,000+ trials
  • Team collaboration tools with admin panel and shared projects
  • API access for integrating Elicit into external workflows

Strengths

  • +Indexes 138M+ scientific papers and 545,000+ clinical trials with semantic search
  • +Structured data extraction tables make systematic reviews dramatically faster
  • +Free tier is genuinely useful — unlimited paper search and basic PDF extraction
  • +Guided systematic review workflows reduce methodological errors for non-experts
  • +Researchers report up to 80% time savings on literature review tasks

Weaknesses

  • −Weak coverage of humanities and theory-heavy fields where PICO-style extraction doesn't apply
  • −AI summaries can oversimplify nuanced findings; critical claims always need manual verification
  • −Not a substitute for keyword-based databases (PubMed, Scopus) in comprehensive reproducible searches
  • −Usage limits on the free tier are restrictive for high-volume workflows, and the step up to Pro ($49) and Scale ($169) is steep

Overview

Overview

Elicit is an AI-powered research assistant built specifically for scientific literature review, developed by the nonprofit organization Ought and launched in 2021. It is used by over 2 million researchers in academia, clinical research, and industry. The core value proposition is automating the most tedious parts of a systematic review: finding relevant papers, extracting structured data from PDFs, and synthesizing evidence across dozens or hundreds of sources.

The platform indexes more than 138 million scientific papers and over 545,000 clinical trials, with semantic search that surfaces relevant work even when the user doesn’t know the precise terminology. Elicit’s extraction tables — where users define column headers and the model populates values across a corpus of papers — are its most distinctive feature and the main driver of the reported 80% time savings on systematic reviews.

Underlying the product are large language models (LLMs) from major frontier providers. Ought has also launched an API so Elicit can be called from within Claude or ChatGPT workflows. The free tier is meaningfully functional, which has driven broad adoption, though serious systematic review work quickly exhausts the PDF extraction limits and pushes users to Pro or Scale tiers.

Elicit is strongest in empirical biomedical, public health, and social science research. It is a poor fit for humanities disciplines where literature resists structured extraction schemas.

Key Benefits

  • Scale: Semantic search across 138M+ papers surfaces relevant literature that keyword searches miss, reducing selection bias in evidence gathering.
  • Structured extraction: Automated table-filling from PDFs compresses days of manual extraction into hours, with user-defined columns.
  • Workflow guidance: Systematic review templates walk researchers through screening, extraction, and synthesis in a reproducible sequence.
  • Accessible free tier: Unlimited search and basic chat with papers requires no payment, lowering the barrier for students and independent researchers.
  • API integration: Callable from Claude and other LLM workflows, enabling Elicit’s citation retrieval to augment general-purpose agents.

Use Cases

  1. Systematic literature reviews — Research teams use Elicit to screen hundreds of papers, extract PICO-structured data, and generate PRISMA-compatible summaries, cutting the typical timeline from weeks to days.
  2. Evidence synthesis for grant writing — Researchers quickly establish the state of evidence on a topic, identify gaps, and pull supporting citations for funding applications.
  3. Clinical trial landscape analysis — The dedicated clinical trials database lets medical researchers survey what has been tested for a condition, with structured extraction of endpoints and outcomes.
  4. Academic paper triage — Graduate students and analysts use the chat and summary features to rapidly assess whether a paper is relevant before reading in depth.

Pricing

Checked October 2026 · USD
Basic$0/month
  • Unlimited search across 138M+ papers
  • Unlimited summaries and chat with papers
  • Limited Research Agent and Research Reports usage
  • Zotero import
Pro$49/month ($588/year)
  • Standard usage for Research Agent, Reports and Systematic Literature Reviews
  • Screen up to 5,000 papers; extract from 135 data sources; 20 table columns
  • Routines, custom extractions and API access
Scale$169/month ($2,028/year)
  • 5x usage for core features
  • Extract and interpret figures from papers
  • Real-time team collaboration, admin panel with usage tracking
  • 200 data sources; 30 table columns
EnterpriseCustom
  • Screen up to 40,000 papers; 40 table columns
  • SSO, SAML, 2FA
  • Dedicated customer success team and custom integrations

Other research agents

AgentOverallFromBest for
Gemini Notebook7.8$4.99/moResearchers, students and analysts who need trustworthy, citation-backed answers over a specific corpus of documents rather than the open web
Consensus7.6FreeGraduate students, clinicians, and researchers who need rapid, evidence-grounded answers from peer-reviewed literature
Harvey7.1CustomLaw firms and in-house legal departments with the budget and change-management capacity to deploy AI across document review, diligence and research at scale.
Hebbia7.0CustomInvestment banks, private equity firms, asset managers and large law firms running document-heavy diligence at scale
Reviewed October 2026 · AI-assisted research, scores verified by an editorVisit Elicit