Elicit
AI for rigorous scientific researchAI research assistant that searches 138M+ scientific papers, extracts data from PDFs, and automates systematic literature reviews.
- Maker
- Ought
- Founded
- 2021
- Pricing
- Free tier
- Last checked
- October 2026
Verdict
AI research assistant that searches 138M+ scientific papers, extracts data from PDFs, and automates systematic literature reviews.
Score breakdown
vs Gemini Notebook, the category leaderBiomedical and social science researchers conducting systematic reviews or evidence synthesis
Key features
- Semantic search across 138M+ papers without requiring exact keyword matches
- Automated data extraction from PDFs into structured tables
- Systematic review workflows with guided PRISMA-compatible steps
- Chat with up to 4 papers simultaneously on the free tier
- Automated research reports synthesizing evidence across sources
- Clinical trials search covering 545,000+ trials
- Team collaboration tools with admin panel and shared projects
- API access for integrating Elicit into external workflows
Strengths
- +Indexes 138M+ scientific papers and 545,000+ clinical trials with semantic search
- +Structured data extraction tables make systematic reviews dramatically faster
- +Free tier is genuinely useful — unlimited paper search and basic PDF extraction
- +Guided systematic review workflows reduce methodological errors for non-experts
- +Researchers report up to 80% time savings on literature review tasks
Weaknesses
- −Weak coverage of humanities and theory-heavy fields where PICO-style extraction doesn't apply
- −AI summaries can oversimplify nuanced findings; critical claims always need manual verification
- −Not a substitute for keyword-based databases (PubMed, Scopus) in comprehensive reproducible searches
- −Usage limits on the free tier are restrictive for high-volume workflows, and the step up to Pro ($49) and Scale ($169) is steep
Overview
Overview
Elicit is an AI-powered research assistant built specifically for scientific literature review, developed by the nonprofit organization Ought and launched in 2021. It is used by over 2 million researchers in academia, clinical research, and industry. The core value proposition is automating the most tedious parts of a systematic review: finding relevant papers, extracting structured data from PDFs, and synthesizing evidence across dozens or hundreds of sources.
The platform indexes more than 138 million scientific papers and over 545,000 clinical trials, with semantic search that surfaces relevant work even when the user doesn’t know the precise terminology. Elicit’s extraction tables — where users define column headers and the model populates values across a corpus of papers — are its most distinctive feature and the main driver of the reported 80% time savings on systematic reviews.
Underlying the product are large language models (LLMs) from major frontier providers. Ought has also launched an API so Elicit can be called from within Claude or ChatGPT workflows. The free tier is meaningfully functional, which has driven broad adoption, though serious systematic review work quickly exhausts the PDF extraction limits and pushes users to Pro or Scale tiers.
Elicit is strongest in empirical biomedical, public health, and social science research. It is a poor fit for humanities disciplines where literature resists structured extraction schemas.
Key Benefits
- Scale: Semantic search across 138M+ papers surfaces relevant literature that keyword searches miss, reducing selection bias in evidence gathering.
- Structured extraction: Automated table-filling from PDFs compresses days of manual extraction into hours, with user-defined columns.
- Workflow guidance: Systematic review templates walk researchers through screening, extraction, and synthesis in a reproducible sequence.
- Accessible free tier: Unlimited search and basic chat with papers requires no payment, lowering the barrier for students and independent researchers.
- API integration: Callable from Claude and other LLM workflows, enabling Elicit’s citation retrieval to augment general-purpose agents.
Use Cases
- Systematic literature reviews — Research teams use Elicit to screen hundreds of papers, extract PICO-structured data, and generate PRISMA-compatible summaries, cutting the typical timeline from weeks to days.
- Evidence synthesis for grant writing — Researchers quickly establish the state of evidence on a topic, identify gaps, and pull supporting citations for funding applications.
- Clinical trial landscape analysis — The dedicated clinical trials database lets medical researchers survey what has been tested for a condition, with structured extraction of endpoints and outcomes.
- Academic paper triage — Graduate students and analysts use the chat and summary features to rapidly assess whether a paper is relevant before reading in depth.
Pricing
Checked October 2026 · USD- Unlimited search across 138M+ papers
- Unlimited summaries and chat with papers
- Limited Research Agent and Research Reports usage
- Zotero import
- Standard usage for Research Agent, Reports and Systematic Literature Reviews
- Screen up to 5,000 papers; extract from 135 data sources; 20 table columns
- Routines, custom extractions and API access
- 5x usage for core features
- Extract and interpret figures from papers
- Real-time team collaboration, admin panel with usage tracking
- 200 data sources; 30 table columns
- Screen up to 40,000 papers; 40 table columns
- SSO, SAML, 2FA
- Dedicated customer success team and custom integrations
