Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg told employees at an internal town hall on July 2 that the company's push into agentic AI has not moved as fast as expected, according to a recording heard by Reuters. Zuckerberg said the "trajectory of the agentic development over at least the last four months hasn't really accelerated in the way that we expected," and acknowledged that Meta's broader AI-focused reorganization "hasn't come to fruition yet."

A reorg that hasn't paid off yet

In May, Meta laid off roughly 10% of its global workforce and reassigned about 7,000 employees to AI-focused teams, a restructuring intended to speed up the company's agentic AI efforts. Zuckerberg told staff the execution of those changes was not as "clean" as it could have been, and that when the reorg was planned in January and February, executives were "worried that we weren't going to move fast enough to adapt." At the time, he said, leadership was "super optimistic" about tools like Anthropic's Claude Code — optimism that hasn't yet translated into the internal results Meta was counting on.

Big spending, so far unmatched by results

The comments land against the backdrop of Meta's massive AI infrastructure buildout — the company is projected to spend as much as $145 billion on AI infrastructure this year, part of a Big Tech capital-spending wave that Reuters put at more than $700 billion combined in 2026. Zuckerberg said he still expects the investment to show more substantial benefits within the next three to six months, but the town hall remarks are a rare public acknowledgment from a major AI lab that agentic capabilities — often pitched as close to replacing entire workflows — are advancing more slowly in practice than executives anticipated.

Why it matters

Meta has been one of the most aggressive spenders on agentic AI ambitions, from consumer-facing "AI employees" to internal engineering agents. Zuckerberg's admission is a notable data point for a market that has priced in rapid, near-term gains from agentic systems: if progress at a company spending well over $100 billion a year is running behind plan, it raises the question of how much slower the ramp might be for competitors with far smaller budgets.